<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection: Discussion papers</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2330/14</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://bora.nhh.no:8080/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>Negotiations in small groups : effects of goal orientation on outcome :</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2330/1552</link>
      <description>Title: Negotiations in small groups : effects of goal orientation on outcome :
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Schei, Vidar</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2001 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thinking deep and feeling good : cognitive motivation and positive affect</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2330/1551</link>
      <description>Title: Thinking deep and feeling good : cognitive motivation and positive affect
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Schei, Vidar; Rognes, Jørn K.; Mykland, Solfrid
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: This article examines how individual differences in cognitive motivation and positive&#xD;
affect influence the outcome in integrative dyadic negotiations. The cognitive&#xD;
motivation and positive affect of 64 participants were measured prior to a simulated&#xD;
negotiation. At the individual level, high cognitive motivation strongly improved the&#xD;
outcome for the sellers, but not for the buyers. When cognitive motivation was low,&#xD;
positive affect enhanced the quality of the outcome for the sellers. The dyadic&#xD;
outcome was positively affected by both the individual difference variables. Cognitive&#xD;
motivation was more important than positive affect, and characteristics of the sellers&#xD;
were more important than those of the buyers.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The strategic management and transaction cost nexus : past debates,</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2330/1550</link>
      <description>Title: The strategic management and transaction cost nexus : past debates,
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Foss, Nicolai J.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The role of transaction cost economics (broadly conceived) in developing&#xD;
research in strategic management has been a hotly debated topic over the&#xD;
last decade. This methodological essay develops the argument that&#xD;
transaction cost insights are more than merely useful complements to&#xD;
existing approaches to strategic management. Rather, they are necessary for&#xD;
adequately understanding the nature of strategizing, because transaction&#xD;
costs are essential aspects of processes of creating, capturing and protecting&#xD;
value. If transaction costs are zero, these processes do not pose any strategic&#xD;
problems. However, when transaction costs are positive, opportunities for&#xD;
value creation through the reduction of inefficiencies caused by transaction&#xD;
costs exist, and protecting and appropriating value are costly activities that&#xD;
dissipate value. The use in strategic management of models in which the&#xD;
fullest possible account of transaction costs is taken is contrasted with more&#xD;
constraining models, in particular the patched-up competitive equilibrium&#xD;
models that are now used as the benchmark models in some important&#xD;
parts of strategic management research, most notably in the core models of&#xD;
the resource-based view.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Inter-organizational relationships and dissolution : a multi-level view"</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2330/1549</link>
      <description>Title: "Inter-organizational relationships and dissolution : a multi-level view"
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Pettersen, Inger Beate
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: In this study we propose that relationship specific investments reduce the likelihood of&#xD;
relationship dissolution. These types of investments increase switching costs and&#xD;
thereby create barriers towards exiting. Additionally, high levels of relationship&#xD;
specific investments enhance partners’ ability and willingness to resort to voice when&#xD;
defections and conflicts arise, and hence postpone exit. Moreover, partner specific&#xD;
investments may emerge as a consequence of individual- or organizational level ties.&#xD;
Furthermore, we argue that organizational dimensions, such as centralization,&#xD;
formalization, size and levels of inclusiveness and inter-organizational dimensions,&#xD;
such as history moderate the effect of interpersonal and inter-organizational ties upon relationship dissolution.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2002 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

