Cancer epidemiology/medical demography:

 

 

The goal is to assess the importance of births, social and economic resources and family situation for cancer incidence and survival. Norwegian register data provide exceptional opportunities for a statistical exploration of such relationships. Methodolgical issues are also addressed: A new method for cancer survial analysis is proposed, and the importance of including both men and women in such studies is demonstrated.

 

 

Kravdal, Ø., E.Glattre and T. Haldorsen (1991). Positive correlation between parity and incidence of thyroid cancer: New evidence based on complete Norwegian birth cohorts.  International Journal of Cancer 49 : 831-836

 

Kravdal, Ø., E. Glattre, G. Kvåle and S. Tretli (1993). A subsite-specific analysis of the relationship between colorectal cancer and parity in complete male and female Norwegian birth cohorts. International Journal of Cancer 53 : 56-61. 

 

Kravdal, Ø. and S. Hansen (1993). Hodgkin's disease: The protective effect of childbearing.  International Journal of Cancer 55: 56-61.

 

Kravdal, Ø. (1995). Is the relationship between childbearing and cancer incidence due to biology or lifestyle? Examples of the importance of using data on men. International Journal of Epidemiology 24 (3) : 477-484.

 

 

Glattre, E. and Ø. Kravdal (1994). Male and female parity and risk of thyroid cancer. International Journal of Cancer 58: 616-617.

 

Kravdal, Ø. and S. Hansen (1996). The importance of childbearing for Hodgkin's disease: New evidence from incidence and mortality models. International Journal of Epidemiology 25 (4): 737-743.

 

Bjørge, T and Ø. Kravdal (1996). Reproductive variables and risk of uterine cervical cancer in Norwegian registry data. Cancer Causes and Control 7: 351-357

 

Bjørge, T and Ø. Kravdal (1996). Reproductive factors and prognosis of uterine cervical cancer in Norway.  British Journal of Cancer 74: 1843-1846

 

Kravdal, Ø. (1997). The attractiveness of an additive hazard model: An example from medical demography. European Journal of Population 13: 33-47

 

Harvei, S. and Ø. Kravdal (1997). The importance of marital and socioeconomic status in incidence and survival of prostate cancer. Preventive Medicine 26:623-632.

 

Kravdal, Ø (1999). Sosiale forskjeller i kreftoverlevelse. Tidsskrift for Den Norske Legeforening 11:1577-83

 

Kravdal, Ø. (2000). Social inequalities in cancer survival.  Population Studies 54: 1-18

 

Fossaa, S.D. and O. Kravdal (2000) Fertility in Norwegian testicular cancer patients. British Journal of Cancer 82: 737-41

 

Kravdal, Ø. (2001) The impact of marital status on cancer survival. Social Science and Medicine 52: 357-368.

 

Kravdal, Ø (2002). A cancer survival model that takes sociodemographic variations in ’normal’ mortality into account: comparison with other models. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health  56 : 309-318

 

Kravdal, Ø (2003) Children, family and cancer survival. International Journal of Cancer 105: 261-266

 

Shkolnikov, V.M., Deev A.D., Kravdal, Ø and Valkonen T. (2004). Educational differentials in male mortality in Russia and Northern Europe. A comparison of an epidemiological cohort from Moscow and St.Petersburg with the male populations of Helsinki and Oslo. Demographic Research online at www.demographic-research.org/ Volumes/Vol10/1