Your E-Mail:

Paper ID (Paper number only):

Paper Title (truncated):

Password:

A) Paper content and originality

1. How relevant is this paper with regards to the field evolvable systems?

Very relevant

Relevant

Of passing interest

Not relevant

Comments:

2. Is the paper technically correct?

Yes

Appears to be, but limited information available

Only partly

No

Comments:

3. What contribution does the paper make to the state-of-the-art?

A major original contribution

Some originality in the work

Little originality present

None

Comments:

4. Nature of the paper

Original research

Mostly survey

Description of an application

Comments:

5. What is the status of the work?

Finished (though possibly suggesting further work)

Under progress with interesting partial results

Idea for a project

Comments:

B) Presentation

1. How would you rate the overall organization of the paper?

Excellent

Good, a few minor changes needed (see comments)

Satisfactory, more major changes required before publishable (see comments)

Poor, unredeemable

Comments:

2. Is the English and clarity of the paper acceptable? (You might consider here the abstract, introduction, readability of the paper.)

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Poor

Comments:

3. Is the bibliography

Complete

Satisfactory, but some additions recommended

Poor

Comments:

C) Recommendation for the program chairs

Definitely accept

Probably accept (see comments)

Probably reject (see comments)

Definitely reject

Comments:

D) Level of confidence of the referee regarding the field of the paper. (On a scale 0-10, 10 an expert, 0 know nothing of this area.)

E) Suggestions to the author(s) for improving the paper:

F) Other comments

Thank you very much for your much valued time and trouble.