BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
TEL;PREF;HOME;VOICE;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:
TEL;PREF;WORK;VOICE;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:75517331
TEL;PREF;FAX;VOICE;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:75517349
TEL;PREF;CELL;VOICE;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:
TEL;PREF;PAGER;VOICE;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:
N:Nordeide;Jarle Tryti;;;
ADR;HOME;POSTAL;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;;;;;
EMAIL;INTERNET:jarle.nordeide@hibo.no
NOTE;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:<U>=0D=0A<P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D3><B><FONT color=3D#808080>Research interest</=
    FONT></B>: <FONT color=3D#000000>evolutionary behavioural ecology, part=
    ner choice, sexual selection, communication, and acoustic communication=
    .</FONT></FONT> <FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D3>I have main=
    ly studied cod (<I>Gadus morhua</I>) and sticklebacks (<I>Gasterosteus =
    aculeatus</I>).</FONT> </P>=0D=0A<P>=0D=0A<TABLE width=3D\"\\\'\\\\\\&quot;92%\\\\\\&quot;\\\'\" border=3D0>=0D=0A<TBODY>=0D=0A<TR>=0D=0A<TD width=3D\"\\\'\\\\\\&quot;100%\\\\\\&quot;\\\'\">&nbsp;=20=0D=0A<P><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D3>During the last years I have=
     studied spawning behaviour of cod. Cod are described as a promiscous g=
    roup spawner in textbooks and papers until lately. This is strange from=
     an evolutionary point of view, and in a review of published papers we =
    suggested that the cod mating system is best described as a \\\\\\\"lek=
    \\\\\\\" mating system. This is based on significantly skewed sex ratio=
    s - mainly towards males - from catches at spawning grounds, recordings=
     of a hushed hubbub of sound from the spawning grounds during spawning,=
     large variation between calls from fish kept in tanks, significantly l=
    arger grunting muscles of males than females (a secondary sexual charac=
    teristic?), and descriptions of an elaborate courtship and dance behavi=
    our prior to the shed of gametes. In an experiment where 9 males and 8 =
    females were crossed in all (72) different combinations and their offsp=
    ring reared and monitored 19 days post-fertilisation, the results revea=
    led a potential for 74 percent higher fitness by active partner choice =
    compared to random mating.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></=
    P>=0D=0A<P><FONT face=3DArial>Two cod groups </FONT><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000=
    000 size=3D3>which, according to population geneticists appearently do =
    not interbreed, both spawn at the same spawning grounds off the Lofoten=
     Islands simultaneously. We suspected that the calls from two cod group=
    s and perhaps dance, were prezygotic behavioural mechanisms preventing =
    interbreeding between the two groups. However, from analysis of grunts =
    from cod in tanks, we have not been able to tell apart sounds from the =
    two cod groups.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></P>=0D=0A<P><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D3>Female sticklebacks from sev=
    eral local populations have red carotenoid-based ornamented pelvic spin=
    es. I tested whether heavily ornamented females are preferred as mates =
    by males. The result, however, showed that males courted drab females m=
    ore than red females. Another study revealed a trade-off between the an=
    ti-oxidant carotenoids in spines and gonads of the females. Males choos=
    ing red coloured females will fertilise eggs with small amounts of caro=
    tenoids and seem not to gain anything regarding their mate\\\\\\\'s phe=
    notypic quality that could result in offspring of improved quality. Thi=
    s interpretation favours the non-adaptive hypotheses to explain the evo=
    lution of red spines in females sticklebacks.&nbsp;</FONT></P>=0D=0A<P><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D3></FONT>&nbsp;</P></TD></TR><=
    /TBODY></TABLE></U></P>=0D=0A<P><U></U>&nbsp;</P>=0D=0A<P><U>&nbsp;</P></U>
URL;WORK:www.hibo.no
REV:2007-11-11T16:00:50Z
MAILER:vCard by NetEd www.neted.no
END:VCARD
