<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>TEORA Collection: Institutt for kultur- og humanistiske fag</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/237</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://teora.hit.no/dspace/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>Kultursektor og sektorovergripende kultur</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/499</link>
      <description>Title: Kultursektor og sektorovergripende kultur
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Kvarv, Sture
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Over the last few years reforms of the Norwegian system of municipal government have been implemented on a broad scale. The background of these reforms has been a general dissatisfaction with sector-based organization and a lack of cooperation between the various sectors. In municipal government new cooperation models, such as the function model, the area model and the inter-municipal cooperation model have been tested. Today each municipality is free to choose which model best suits its own needs and interests. The cultural field is complex and has diffuse borders. These new multi-sectorial models are therefore well suited for the cultural sector. However, all of these models represent dilemmas, and in particular the area model.  A consequence of this model is that the cultural sector in municipal government and in the budget system will probably be more integrated in other sectors, and thus become more invisible. It will also most likely lead to a decrease in funding. In spite of this, this essay argues for a municipal area model as a starting point for organizing the cultural administration. An area model is more in harmony with the national goals for cultural policy, which are to develop a local cultural administration for cross-sectorial cooperation between culture and other sectors. However, this area model must be supplemented with models on a higher administrative and geographical level in order to offer the local population cultural activities at a high professional level.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 1997 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ønskekvistmodellen : kunstnerisk kvalitet i performativ kunst : recension</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/498</link>
      <description>Title: Ønskekvistmodellen : kunstnerisk kvalitet i performativ kunst : recension
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Kvarv, Sture</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2003 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allmenn kulturlov i Norge : mellom juss og kulturpolitikk</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/497</link>
      <description>Title: Allmenn kulturlov i Norge : mellom juss og kulturpolitikk
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Kvarv, Sture
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The article discusses the political process in connection with a general law regulating the cultural field in Norway. This particular question will be related to the area of cultural politics and to the development of the central bureaucracy/public administration over the last twenty years. The bill is already under way. The deadline for the hearing was 1 February, and the bill will be passed into law in the course of 2007. We will be discussing dilemmas, justifications and resistance in connection with the legal regulation of the cultural field in general and with the specific law in particular. We ask why this is happening right now, and about necessary political and legal clarifications. One important issue is the distribution of authority between the state and the municipalities with regard to the cultural field. Our conclusion is that a general law regulating the cultural field may in its turn produce a law which will commit the municipal level to a minimum effort in the cultural field, but which will also contain the kind of flexibility that will enable the individual municipality to prioritise in accordance with changing needs among its inhabitants.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lidvinismen i norsk kulturpolitikk : konjakk, sigarer og forskning i Stavanger</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/495</link>
      <description>Title: Lidvinismen i norsk kulturpolitikk : konjakk, sigarer og forskning i Stavanger
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Mangset, Per</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

