Progressive Alignment Problem:
In progressive alignment, first the pairs of sequences which are most similar
to each other, are aligned. Next, the resulting alignments are aligned
to produce bigger alignments and finally one alignment is obtained containing
all sequences in the set.
A pairwise alignment is never changed in the later rounds of alignments
(once a gap, always a gap).
What will happen in the following case? We have sequences A, B, and C.
All three sequences contain the sequence acdef. Additionally, sequences A
and B share an 80 letter long sequence, that is
A=acdefMSAAAYMDFVAAQCLVSISNRAAVPEHGGAPDAERLRLPEREVTKEHGDPGDTWKDYCTL
B=MSAAAYMDFVAAQCLVSISNRAAVPEHGGAPDAERLRLPEREVTKEHGDPGDTWKDYCTLacdef
C=acdef
In FastA format:
>A
acdefMSAAAYMDFVAAQCLVSISNRAAVPEHGGAPDAERLRLPEREVTKEHGDPGDTWKDYCTL
>B
MSAAAYMDFVAAQCLVSISNRAAVPEHGGAPDAERLRLPEREVTKEHGDPGDTWKDYCTLacdef
>C
acdefDLRRSQSAGS
-
What will happen when the three sequences are aligned using the progressive method?
-
Is it likely that local multiple sequence alignment methods or pattern discovery methods
do a better job in this case? Try MEME and Pratt on this sequence set (in Pratt you should switch off pattern refinement when so few sequences are analysed). Do not be intimidated by the size of the output from MEME and Pratt, look for the alignments corresponding to the highest ranked patterns/local alignments (one from Pratt and one from MEME), and paste into your report the description of these.