Discussion Papers 2003

IØR

Most papers are downloadable. Please do not hesitate to contact the author(s) if you have comments etc.

Discussion Paper #D-12/2003
Stein Holden, Christopher B. Barrett* & Fitsum Hagos* ” Food-for-work for Poverty Reduction and the Promotion of Sustainable Land Use: Can It Work?”

Discussion Paper #D-11/2003
Arild Vatn, ” Valuing Forest Ecosystems - An Institutional Perspective.”

Discussion Paper #D-10/2003
Arild Vatn, Lars Bakken*, Marina A. Bleken*, et al. ” A Methodology for Interdisciplinary Analyses of Pollution from Agriculture.”

Discussion Paper #D-9/2003
Olvar Bergland, ” Geografisk avgrensing av marknaden for finansielle tenester til små og mellomstore bedrifter.”

Discussion Paper #D-8/2003
Frode Alfnes & Kyrre Rickertsen, ” European consumers' acceptance of US hormone-treated beef.”

Discussion Paper #D-7/2003
Ingebjørg K. Vestrum* & Even Lanseng, ” The Relative Importance of Cost-Benefit Tradeoffs and Perceived Risk Assessments in Consumers' Consideration of Norwegian versus Foreign Food Products: The Case of Herbs Consumption.”

Discussion Paper #D-6/2003
Hanne Sivertsen* & Even Lanseng, ” Expectation and Expertise Effects in Consumers' Judgments.”

Discussion Paper #D-5/2003
Frode Alfnes, ” Combining Stated Choice and Experimental Data.”

Discussion Paper #D-4/2003
Santa Masandaviciute and Even Lanseng, ” Effects Of Secondary Associations On Consumers' Brand Valuation.”

Discussion Paper #D-3/2003
Eirik Romstad, Haldor Fykse* & Helge Lundekvam, ” Environment and agriculture - the dichotomy of erosion and weed control.”

Discussion Paper #D-2/2003
Eirik Romstad, Haldor Fykse* & Arild Vatn, ” Policies for reducing pesticide use in agriculture.”

Discussion Paper #D-1/2003
Eirik Romstad & Helge Lundekvam, “Policies for reducing erosion from agriculture.”

This series consists of papers intended to stimulate discussion. Some of the papers are of a preliminary character and should thus not be referred
to or quoted without permission from the author(s). The interpretations and conclusions in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Economics and Resource Management nor of the Norwegian University of Life Sciences.


Oppdatert: 30.04.05
Utskriftsvennlig versjon : Arkiv : Tips en venn