<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection: Gastroenterologi</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/347</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://teora.hit.no:8443/dspace/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>Quality control in colorectal cancer screening: systematic microbiological investigation of endoscopes used in the NORCCAP (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention) trial</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/428</link>
      <description>Title: Quality control in colorectal cancer screening: systematic microbiological investigation of endoscopes used in the NORCCAP (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention) trial
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Bretthauer, Michael; Jørgensen, Anita; Kristiansen, Bjørn Erik; Hofstad, Bjørn; Hoff, Geir
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: BACKGROUND: Endoscopic colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is currently implemented in many countries. Since endoscopes cannot be sterilised, the transmission of infectious agents through endoscopes has been a matter of concern. We report on a continuous quality control programme in a large-scale randomised controlled trial on flexible sigmoidoscopy screening of an average-risk population. Continuously, throughout a two-year screening period, series of microbiological samples were taken from cleaned ready-to-use endoscopes and cultured for bacterial growth. RESULTS: 8573 endoscopies were performed during the trial period. Altogether, 178 microbiological samples (2%) were taken from the biopsy channels and surfaces from the endoscopes. One sample (0.5%) showed faecal contamination (Enterobacter cloacae), and 25 samples (14%) showed growth of environmental bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Growth of bacteria occurs in a clinical significant number of samples from ready-to-use endoscopes. Pathogenic bacteria, however, were found only in one sample. Improvement of equipment design and cleaning procedures are desirable and continuous microbiological surveillance of endoscopes used in CRC screening is recommended.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Air and carbon dioxide volumes insufflated during colonoscopy</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/426</link>
      <description>Title: Air and carbon dioxide volumes insufflated during colonoscopy
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Bretthauer, Michael; Hoff, Geir; Thiis-Evensen, Espen; Huppertz-Hauss, Gert; Skovlund, Eva
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: BACKGROUND: During colonoscopy, air or carbon dioxide is insufflated to secure adequate visualization of the colon, and endoscopy trainees are reminded to use as little gas as possible to avoid patient discomfort. However, the volume of gas insufflated by endoscopists during colonoscopy is unknown. The aim of the present study was to measure volumes of carbon dioxide and air insufflated during colonoscopy. METHODS: A total 249 consecutive patients participating in a colorectal cancer screening program were randomized to undergo colonoscopy with either carbon dioxide or air insufflation. Gas volumes insufflated during the procedure were measured with a mass-flowmeter. Four experienced endoscopists performed all of the examinations. RESULTS: Gas volumes were successfully measured in 218 (87%) patients. A mean of 8.3 L of carbon dioxide (range 1.2-19.8 L) and 8.2 L of air (range 1.8-18 L) were insufflated (p = 0.9). Mean volumes insufflated per minute were estimated to be 0.26 L and 0.24 L, respectively, in the carbon dioxide and air groups (p = 0.5). Statistically significant differences in the volumes of gas insufflated per minute were observed among some of the endoscopists. CONCLUSIONS: The volumes of carbon dioxide and air used during colonoscopy can be estimated. Differences in volumes of gas used by experienced endoscopists were detected.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CRC screening: review of the evidence and suggestions on when and how to move on from randomized trials to screening programmes</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/425</link>
      <description>Title: CRC screening: review of the evidence and suggestions on when and how to move on from randomized trials to screening programmes
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Hoff, Geir</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2003 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The science and politics of colorectal cancer screening</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/423</link>
      <description>Title: The science and politics of colorectal cancer screening
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Hoff, Geir; Bretthauer, Michael</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

