<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>TEORA</title>
    <link>http://teora.hit.no:8443/dspace</link>
    <description>The DSpace digital repository system captures, stores, indexes, preserves, and distributes digital research material.</description>
    <textInput>
      <title>The DSpace search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://teora.hit.no:8443/dspace/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>Hustru og Moder : metaforer i bibliotekprofesjonen og bibliotekinstitusjonen</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/445</link>
      <description>Title: Hustru og Moder : metaforer i bibliotekprofesjonen og bibliotekinstitusjonen
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Bancel, Suzanne</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2003 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kva er ting for menneska?</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/444</link>
      <description>Title: Kva er ting for menneska?
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Svalastog, Marit Svale
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Denne oppgåva spring ut av ei undring kring det opplevde kulturelle fokuset på&#xD;
ting og forbruk. Korleis kan me forklare dette forbruket? Eg tykkjer ofte å ha&#xD;
høyrd at folk er så opptekne av ting fordi dei er så overflatiske. Men kvifor er&#xD;
det alltid dei andre som er overflatiske, ingen seier vel at dei er det sjølve? Er&#xD;
det heile kanskje berre ei overflatisk forklaring? I kva grad kan forteljingar om&#xD;
ting seie noko om den norske samtidskulturen?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nordlyset : fra iscenesettelse til opplevelse</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/443</link>
      <description>Title: Nordlyset : fra iscenesettelse til opplevelse
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Ask, Liv</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On the integration of object-based models and field-based models in GIS</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2282/442</link>
      <description>Title: On the integration of object-based models and field-based models in GIS
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Kjenstad, Kjell
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: This paper proposes a common base-model for the classical object-based and field-based conceptual models in GIS. The model, which is called the PGOModel or 'Parameterized Geographic Object Model', is given a formal definition by using the UML modelling language. Within the scope of the paper, it has been shown that the PGOModel encompasses the classical object-based and field-based models. Two extensive examples demonstrate the application of the PGO model. The PGOModel seems ontologically well founded, except for the so-called PGOAtom concept.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

