TEORA  
 

TEORA > Høgskolen i Telemark > Avd. for allmennvitenskapelige fag > Institutt for natur-, helse- og miljøvernfag >

English Norsk

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2282/537

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Potential_risks.pdf158.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Potential risks of olfactory signaling : the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
Authors: Rosell, Frank
Sanda, Jørn Ingar
Issue Date: 2006
Publishers version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl022
Citation: Behavioral ecology 17(2006), No. 6, p. 897-904
Status: Peer reviewed
Abstract: Mammals scent mark their territories to advertise occupancy and ownership. However, signaling with scent for territorial defense can have a negative effect by advertising an individual’s presence and location to predators. In this study, we measured responses to a simulated territorial intrusion by conspecific adult male Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) either in the localized presence or in the absence of odor of a predator to test the hypothesis that the territorial defense of free-living beavers would be disrupted by the presence of predation risk in their natural environment. We predicted that beavers would significantly reduce their willingness to countermark intruder’s scent in the presence of the scent of predators (wolf [Canis lupus] and lynx [Lynx lynx]), compared with a control (no odor), as responses are in general stronger to predator scent marks than nonpredator scent. Therefore, we also predicted that the effects of nonpredatory mammal scent (neophobic control) (eland [Taurotragus oryx] and horse [Equus cabalus]) are to be expected somewhere in between the effects of the predator odor and a control. Our results suggest that both predator and nonpredator scents reduce beavers response to a simulated intruder’s scent mounds and therefore disrupt their territorial defense. However, predator scent had a stronger effect than nonpredator scent. Beavers may therefore be at great risk on territories with predators present because of the trade-off between predator avoidance and territorial defense. Our study demonstrates the potential of predation risk as a powerful agent of counterselection on olfactory signaling behavior.
Keywords: Bever
Duftmarkering
Duft
Signaler
Kjemiske signaler
Atferd
Territorial atferd
Description: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Behavioral ecology following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl022
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2282/537
Appears in Collections:Institutt for natur-, helse- og miljøvernfag

This item is protected by a usage licens. All items in TEORA are protected by copyright.

 

TEORA runs on DSpace 1.4
Telemark University College owns all rights for this page
Telemark University College, Library, Postboks 203, 3901 Porsgrunn
Telephone: 35952543, Email: teora@hit.no
Webmaster: Arild Skalmeraas
Technical webmaster: Rune Pettersen
Editor: Biblioteksjef Frode Bakken