Financial Stability 1/2003
2 International developments and securities
markets

2.1 The international environment
2.2 Securities markets in Norway
Rammer:
- The effect of the fall in share prices on pension schemes
- The P/E ratio for the Norwegian stock market
2.1 The international environment
International financial markets are still marked by the downturn in the global
economy and by the stock value corrections which began three years ago. The
projections for growth in the world economy in the near future have been revised
downwards. The revival in the stock markets in the last few months and declining
risk premiums on US corporate debt may, however, be an indication of increased
optimism among many market participants.
Servicing debt has been an increasing problem in many countries. Nevertheless,
the burden on banks has generally been limited, to a large extent because
capital adequacy has been high and probably also because risk management has
improved. Interest rate risk has increased for both banks and insurance companies.
A continuation of recent developments, with relatively high loan losses and
falling asset prices, will increase the risk of more serious problems in financial
institutions.
Inflation is very low or falling in a number of large countries. Until now,
few countries have had a sustained period of deflation. A substantial, sustained
fall in the general price level may have an unfavourable impact on financial
stabil-ity because debt to the general public increases in relation to wages
and prices, and because it may be impossible to lower real interest rates.
The value of collateral for loans also falls.
Private consumption has sustained economic activity in many countries, partly
on the basis of a rise in house prices. A recovery in the global economy will
therefore probably depend on a rebound in investment. The outlook for corporate
earnings is deteriorating, however, because many companies must use future
earnings to safeguard pension obligations, as the fall in equity prices has
resulted in large shortfalls in relation to commitments under defined benefit
pension schemes.
International stock markets continue to fall
The stock market continued to fall early this year after a brief lull in October
and November 2002 (see Chart 2.1). There have been few clear macroeconomic
signals of a recovery in the global economy. Nevertheless, stock markets have
risen since mid-March, in part because the war in Iraq has been concluded.
In a number of countries, equity prices have passed the level prevailing at
the beginning of 2003.
Chart 2.1
Annual returns on equity investments have been low for several years. Nevertheless,
over a 10-year horizon, returns including dividends have been approximately
9-10% in Europe and the US (see Table 2.1). Returns have been very low in
the Japanese market, where share prices have now returned to the level prevailing
more than 20 years ago.
Table 2.1
The price fall has generally been sharper than the decline in expected earnings
in listed companies. This has contributed to a fall in the price-earnings
ratio (P/E), especially in the US (see Chart 2.2). Nevertheless, P/E ratios
are still higher than the average in the period 1988-1998. The P/E ratio across
all shares listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange has been analysed in a separate
box.
Chart 2.2
The interest rate level has been falling for a long time and is now very low
in many countries. This is also the case for securities with long maturities
(see Chart 2.3). High demand for fixed-income securities may have contributed
to high bond values. If long-term interest rates increase again, both insurance
companies and banks may incur considerable losses on their bond portfolios.
This is discussed in greater detail below.
Chart 2.3
The effect of the fall in share prices on pension
schemes
The sharp fall in equity prices in the last three years has reduced the wealth
of life insurance companies and pension funds. In Norway, the majority of
the collective pension schemes are defined-benefit schemes. A defined-benefit
pension means that the pension is independent of the return on the capital
in the pension scheme. Pension schemes have long-term liabilities which
are known. Therefore, it should be possible to invest the assets long-term
in instruments such as equities which generate higher returns than loan
capital over time, but with considerably greater fluctuations.
To ensure that pension schemes can pay future pensions, there must be a certain
correspondence between the company’s wealth and the present value
of pension liabilities. This may limit investment possibilities considerably,
or cause a sudden shift in companies’ adjustments if wealth must correspond
to the present value of pension liabilities at all times. In Norway, pension
schemes are required to have sufficient capital to meet liabilities at all
times. A guaranteed annual return is also common. Return guarantees require
large buffers to ensure that companies can withstand years with low or negative
returns. The alternative to large buffers for ensuring return guarantees
is investments in assets with little variation in returns. The rules may
lead to modest investments in equities in relation to companies’ long-term
liabilities or may force the sale of equities when share prices fall substantially.
The sale of a large number of shares may contribute to pushing prices down
still further.
Table 1 shows that Norwegian pension schemes reduced their shareholdings
substantially after international stock markets peaked in the spring of
2000. Growth until that time had been related to the fact that the maximum
equity share in companies had been raised in May 1998 from 20% to 35%. In
other countries, it is primarily life insurance com-panies that have reduced
their shareholdings. An increase in share prices may be curbed if pension
funds also choose to reduce their equity share.
Table 1
Pension schemes are far less important than banks to financial stability.
Pension schemes do not risk negative liquidity shocks like banks do if many
depositors want to withdraw their deposits. Pension schemes do not have
a function in the payment system either. However, problems can spread in
conglomerates comprised of a bank and a pension scheme if a sharp fall in
the securities markets requires a recapitalisation of the pension scheme.
In defined-contribution pension schemes, the individual and not the pension
scheme bears the risk associated with returns. This reduces the risk of
contagion to the rest of the financial sector. A larger share of defined-contribution
pension schemes may therefore have a favourable impact on financial stability.
In many countries, including Norway, there is a considerable gap between
pension liabilities and the financing of these schemes in private enterprises
with defined-benefit pension schemes. In the US, for example, the coverage
of pension liabilities fell from 131% in 1999 to 80% at the end of 2002.
If an enterprise guarantees the financing of a pension scheme, it must cover
the gap in financing. How quickly this must be done and how large the shortfalls
can be in relation to the liabilities varies from one country to another.
Uncertainty surrounding future pension payments makes it difficult to evaluate
enterprises’ future earnings and thus developments in share prices.
The EU is introducing requirements to record liabilities and investments
at market value and to have sufficient capital to cover pension liabilities.
These changes in the EEA rules will not cause any particular problems in
Norway since the fundamental principles are already laid down in Norwegian
legislation.
Increased saving in liquid assets
The accumulation of liquid assets in the household and corporate sectors has
been particularly marked in the US, but the same tendency is also evident
in Europe and Japan. Combined with the fall in equity values, this has, for
example, resulted in US household bank deposits approaching the value of shareholdings
for the first time since 1994 (see Chart 2.4). Developments in the corporate
sector have been similar, and in the US, liquid assets are now larger than
short-term debt. This development does not simply imply financial consolidation.
It also means that large reserves may be transferred quickly to equity markets
or to fixed investment if perceptions about future earnings change.
Chart 2.4
An easing of monetary policy, particularly in the US, has made it comparatively
more profitable to invest in long-term fixed income securities, even though
long-term interest rates have also fallen. This has allowed banks to convert
large deposits from the private sector to investments in long-term fixed income
securities with a solid interest margin. As a result, banks’ interest
rate risk has increased. Stronger economic growth ahead may result in the
movement of capital from bank deposits to the stock market, as long-term interest
rates rise and the market value of these securities falls. The consequence
may be that banks have to cover immediate needs for liquidity by selling their
holdings in a falling bond market.
Increasing bank losses, but solid financial strength in most countries
US banking operations were positive in 2002. Results for the banking industry
as a whole were the best since 1998. Net losses written off increased considerably
less than the year before and the default rate fell. On the other hand, the
default rate in the bond market was very high in 2002 (see Chart 2.5). To
a greater degree than before, banks’ results seem to be robust with
regard to developments in the corporate sector. This is probably due to some
extent to better risk management, where the use of financial instruments in
particular has made it possible to move credit risk out of the banks. Nevertheless,
the occurrence of bankruptcies in the banking sector increased markedly last
year, measured in terms of both the number of banks and total assets in these
banks (see Chart 2.6).
Chart 2.5 Chart
2.6
German banks' earnings have been relatively low for a long time. This is due
to overcapacity, high costs and competition from institutions with public
sector affiliations. They have also recorded substantial losses on equity
holdings in German companies. A number of the largest banks have tried to
boost earnings by increasing activities in the area of securities trading,
underwriting and advisory services. Results in these areas have also been
weak, however, due to market developments. In addition, a low level of economic
activity in Germany has contributed to increasing loan losses. This has led
to a proposal to establish special institutions which can relieve banks of
their loan portfolios and free up capital which may be used for new loans.
Table 6.2 shows that German banks have had considerably higher losses and
lower returns on equity than banks in many other European countries.
Table 6.2
Banks in Japan are plagued by large unrealised losses on loans and share portfolios.
This is reflected in the fall in prices for Japanese bank shares (see Chart
2.7). In a number of large banks, capital increases designed to improve the
balance sheet before closing the accounts on 31 March resulted in an increasing
degree of cross-ownership between banks and their customers as well as the
rest of the financial sector. Therefore, the capital increases have scarcely
reduced systemic risk in Japan.
Chart 2.7
At the end of the third quarter of 2002, Norwegian banks had claims on foreign
banks equivalent to NOK 38.7bn. Therefore, problems in foreign banks will
only have a modest direct spillover effect on Norwegian banks but may affect
Norwegian banks’ access to financing (see Chapter 4).
Who has the credit risk?
Investors may purchase insurance against different forms of credit loss through
credit derivatives. Globally, banks have been net buyers of such insurance.
Credit risk has thus been moved out of the banks, which may have contributed
to their relatively positive developments despite an increasing number of
bankruptcies and defaults in the corporate sector. Insurance companies are
the largest sellers of insurance against credit risk. Therefore, ultimately,
the risk may be concentrated in a few large reinsurance companies. Although
banks as a whole have been relieved of credit risk through these markets,
individual banks have issued credit derivatives to a large extent to take
on credit risk. Studies from the rating agency Fitch suggest that small German
banks in particular have been active.
Developments in emerging economies
Uncertainty in the global economy has made it more expensive for many borrowers
in emerging economies to obtain funding in the international bond market.
However, investors have demonstrated the ability to distinguish between different
borrowers. Positive signals concerning economic policy in Brazil have resulted
in a significant reduction in the yield differential on Brazilian government
debt (see Chart 2.8). However, new international borrowing by Latin American
countries was considerably lower in 2002 than in 2001.
Chart 2.8
2.2 Securities markets in Norway
The Oslo Stock Exchange’s all-share index fell from December 2002 until
the end of February. Since then, it has recovered substantially (see Chart
2.9). During this period, developments in the sub-index for industrials and
in a weighted average of the IT and telecoms index were somewhat weaker than
developments in the all-share index. The energy index has avoided a similar
fall due in part to high oil prices. The financial index has fluctuated widely
but has also climbed because of a price increase in connection with the merger
negotiations between DnB and Union Bank of Norway.
Chart 2.9
New share issues on the Oslo Stock Exchange totalled only NOK 5.6bn in 2002,
down from NOK 28.5bn in 2001. New issue activity during the first four months
of 2003 has been somewhat lower than in the same period last year. The few
new issues that have been completed so far this year were mainly rescue operations
for companies in crisis.
Activity in the bond market is high. In 2002, new issues and increases of existing
issues amounted to NOK 107.6bn, 63% higher than in 2001. The Government and
government-owned enterprises accounted for 38% of this. In the first four
months of 2003, new issues and increases were 23% higher than in the same
period last year. Banks and insurance companies have accounted for approximately
31% of the new issues so far this year, which is a reduction from slightly
more than 40% in the two previous calendar years.
Turnover in the stock market, including primary capital certificates, fell
more than 20% from 2001 to 2002. This, combined with the low volume of new
issues, has resulted in a marked decline in operating profits for securities
firms. Lower operating income has been somewhat offset by cost reductions
in the form of job cuts and lower bonus payments. In March, one securities
firm terminated its operations, and further consolidation in this business
sector cannot be ruled out unless income picks up.
The P/E ratio for the Norwegian stock market
The relationship between share price and earnings, the P/E ratio, is used
to evaluate individual companies as well as business sectors and the stock
market as a whole. Theoretically, the price of a share represents the sum
of discounted future cash flows. Seen from this perspective, a P/E ratio
based on expected earnings is to be preferred. Due to the lack of data series
on expected earnings, we have calculated the P/E ratio for the Norwegian
stock market on the basis of historical earnings.
The calculation of the P/E ratio for each year is based on data for the Norwegian
companies that were listed on the stock exchange at the end of the year
in question. Ordinary profit/loss is used as a measure of earnings. The
P/E ratio for the entire stock market is calculated as the sum of the market
value of all companies divided by the sum of earnings of all companies (see
Chart 1). Most striking is the sharp increase in the P/E ratio from 1998
to 1999 followed by a persistently high level. The current level is well
above the average for the period 1993-2001, which was 13.5. This is considerably
lower than the P/E ratio for the US stock market, where the average P/E
ratio was well above 20 in the same period. It is difficult to compare P/E
ratios between countries, however, partly because of different accounting
principles and interest rate levels.
Chart 1
It is possible to take a closer look at developments in the P/E ratio by
considering developments in the two components, market value and earnings
(see Chart 2). Market value rose steadily in the period 1993-2001, with
the exception of a decline in 1998. The increase in market value in 2000
and 2001 reflects, among other things, the listings of Telenor (2000) and
Statoil (2001). If Statoil had not been listed, market value would have
fallen in 2001. Market value fell in 2002. The strong growth in earnings
from 1994 to 1995 reflects a period of prosperity in Norwegian business
and industry. The decline in earnings in the period 1997-1999 was partly
due to the effects of the Asian crisis and strong growth in domestic costs.
The decline in earnings in 1998 was not reflected in a lower P/E ratio because
there was a similar decline in prices. On the other hand, the P/E ratio
rose sharply in 1999 because the stock market was rising, while at the same
time earnings continued to decline. If we exclude Telenor and Statoil, the
P/E ratio in 2001 would have been approximately 50. This illustrates the
influence the largest companies on the Oslo Stock Exchange have on the reported
P/E ratio. At the end of 2001, Statoil and Telenor accounted for approximately
one-third of the market value of the Oslo Stock Exchange, and their combined
P/E ratio was barely 10. If Norsk Hydro is also excluded in 2001, the remaining
companies, which accounted for slightly more than half of the market value
of the Oslo Stock Exchange, would have had total earnings of about zero.
Chart 2
Official accounts for 2002 are not yet available for all companies listed
on the Oslo Stock Exchange. On the basis of calculations for the seven companies
with the highest market value at the end of 2002, the P/E ratio for 2002
appears to be at about the same level as in 2001.