Financial Stability 2/2001
2 International developments and securities markets

2.1 The international environment
2.2 Securities markets in Norway
Boxes:
Terrorist attacks in the US – immediate effects on the
financial sector
Indicators of price levels in the stock market
2.1 The international environment
Growth forecasts for the global economy have been further revised downwards
after the terrorist attacks in the US on 11 September. Easing of monetary policy
in a number of countries has reduced borrowing costs for households and companies.
However, slower income growth, which is a result of the downturn, weakens debt
servicing capacity. Although banks in many countries have strengthened credit
rating procedures and increased their capital adequacy in recent years, the
vulnerability of the financial sector has increased due to developments in the
last few months. There are signs of an increasing number of bankruptcies and
non-performing loans in a number of countries. The situation in Japanese banks
has worsened as a result of the decline in share prices, rising loan losses
and continued deflation.
Uncertainty surrounding some emerging economies is high, especially in Argentina,
where the authorities have now asked to renegotiate interest terms on their
foreign currency debt.
Wide fluctuations in stock markets
The US stock market has been characterised by periods of sharp decline in prices
and a high degree of uncertainty since September 2000 (see Chart 2.1). Share
prices continued to fall through the summer following a temporary rise in April
and May. The decline was aggravated by the terrorist attacks on 11 September.
From the end of May to the last week of September, the S&P 500 index fell
by more than 26%. Since prices hit bottom on 21 September, they have climbed
again. The S&P 500 index is now almost 5% higher than just prior to the
terrorist attacks, due in particular to developments in technology shares. The
prolonged decline in the US stock market must be seen in the light of expectations
about weaker growth and reduced earnings in listed companies.
Chart 2.1
Information from the options market indicates that the uncertainty is greater
now than half a year ago (see Chart 2.2). In connection with the terrorist attacks,
implied volatility rose sharply, but the level is now approximately at the historical
average for the last three years. Market participants' estimates for listed
companies' future earnings indicate nevertheless that they believe that the
recession will be brief and that earnings will rise again quickly (see Chart
2.3).
Chart 2.2 Chart
2.3
Developments in the European stock markets have largely shadowed developments
in the US the last year. Since May of this year, however, the European markets
have fallen more sharply than the US market, despite a more positive growth
outlook for Europe, compared with the US. The correlation with the US stock
market may be explained in part by the fact that large European companies are
vulnerable to changes in demand in the US economy, especially through their
US subsidiaries. The spread of confidence effects from the US to Europe probably
plays a significant role as well.1
1 See the box in Norges Bank's
Inflation Report 1/2001, pp. 16-17.
In the US and Europe, the decline has at times been driven by strong price
corrections in the ICT sector. From March 2000 to March 2001, US ICT shares
fell by more than 50%. At its peak, the market value of the ICT sector accounted
for as much as 45% of the US stock market, although value added in the sector
only accounted for 9% of value added for the entire enterprise sector in 1997.
At the end of October this year, the sector accounted for approximately 25%
of total market capitalisation in the US stock market. Developments are also
reflected in the P/E ratio in the ICT sector compared with the rest of the stock
market (see Chart 2.4 and separate box).
Chart 2.4
Terrorist attacks in the US – immediate effects
on the financial sector
The terrorist attacks in the US on Tuesday, 11 September 2001, had both direct
and indirect effects on the financial sector.
Many key participants in the financial sector, particularly in securities
markets, were directly affected by the attacks inasmuch as they leased considerable
office space in the World Trade Center (WTC).
The terrorist attacks occurred before the US stock market would have opened.
The stock exchanges were technically unable to open. The American Stock Exchange
(AMEX) is located very close to the WTC, while the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) is located in lower Manhattan. The US supervisory authorities immediately
decided that the stock market should remain closed until Thursday, 13 September.
Trading in the US derivatives market was also halted.
Trading in the US bond market was suspended during the morning of 11 September
because many key participants were unable to participate. Trading in the government
bond market was resumed on Thursday, 13 September. The market was characterised
by poor liquidity the first few days after reopening.
The stock exchanges NYSE, Nasdaq and AMEX opened again on Monday, 17 September,
after being closed for the longest period since the Second World War. In connection
with the reopening, a number of measures were introduced to enable the market
to function. Among other things, companies were given expanded rights to buy
their own shares. Moreover, the Federal Reserve lowered its key rate by 50
basis points to 3% before the stock exchange opened. The reopening of the
US stock market took place without problems, but prices fell by 5% the first
day.
In Europe, no stock exchanges were closed, but trading in shares primarily
quoted in the US were suspended in many countries, including Norway. As long
as the US stock market was closed, purchases and sales of units in unit trusts
with US equities were suspended because it was impossible to provide a correct
valuation of the units.
The reduced activity in USD-based markets created a shortage of dollar liquidity.
In order to ensure sufficient dollar liquidity in the foreign exchange market,
the Federal Reserve entered into currency swaps with a number of foreign central
banks.
The Depository Trust Corporation, which is responsible for clearing, settling
and registering US securities, remained open throughout the period. However,
there were some problems in connection with the fact that Bank of New York,
which handles clearing and settlement for a large portion of the government
bond market, had to relocate its offices. In order to prevent any problems
in securities settlements, longer than normal settlement periods were agreed
in many cases in the days following the terrorist attacks. One reason that
this was possible was that market participants had confidence in the counterparty's
ability to settle.
The authorities in both the US and other countries attempted to ensure that
financial markets, including payment systems, would function satisfactorily
under the prevailing conditions. Among other things, considerable extraordinary
liquidity was supplied. On Wednesday, 12 September, Norges Bank issued a press
release stating that the Norwegian payment system would be open as usual and
that no problems in the system were expected as a result of the terrorist
attacks. Moreover, Norges Bank announced that the Bank would as usual ensure
that the banking system's NOK liquidity was sufficient. All in all, the financial
sector functioned without major problems in this period. The authorities'
measures and the willingness to cooperate between participants and between
participants and the authorities contributed to this.
The indirect effects of the terrorist attacks were immediate changes in prices
in stock, bond and foreign exchange markets as a result of altered perceptions
concerning the economic outlook.
The most important international stock markets fell substantially up to Friday,
21 September. Nevertheless, the decline cannot be characterised as panic-driven
since there were considerable differences across industries. In the US, airlines,
hotels and insurance companies showed a particularly sharp fall.
The uncertainty in financial markets, measured by implied volatility for
the stock market and yield spreads in the bond market, increased markedly
following the terrorist attacks (see Charts 2.2 and 2.5). Bond yields and
the dollar exchange rate fell slightly, while gold and the Swiss franc to
some extent functioned as a safe haven. The exchange rate effects were relatively
limited.
Chart 2.2 Chart
2.5
Lower interest rates and a reduction in lending growth
The deterioration in the economic situation has led to slower credit growth
in many countries. In the US, total credit to the private sector rose by 7¼%
in the first half of 2001, down from 8½% in 2000. Continued high demand
for dwellings and other consumer durables have contributed to sustaining the
demand for loans in the household sector. In the euro area, the 12-month growth
in lending to the private sector was 6.9% in September, down from a growth rate
of more than 10% in 1999 and 2000. In Japan, on the other hand, banks' loans
to the private sector continue to fall at an annual rate of more than 2%, despite
an expansionary monetary policy.
The interest rate cuts in the US and Europe have reduced the costs of short-term
fixed-interest loans. Long-term interest rates have fallen less. In addition,
the yield spread on bonds has widened (see Chart 2.5).
Chart 2.5
So far, the cyclical downturn has not resulted in extensive defaults. A survey
conducted by the supervisory authorities in the US show, however, that the share
of syndicated loans considered to be doubtful rose to 9.4% of all syndicated
loans in the second quarter of 2001.2 This was an increase from 5.1% a year
ago, but is still far below the peak level of 16% from the previous downturn.
2 A syndicated loan is a loan provided by a
group of banks.
Developments in emerging economies
Emerging economies are affected by slower growth in industrialised countries
and an increased risk aversion among investors. Hardest hit are countries with
large foreign debt, such as Argentina, Brazil and Turkey. The risk premium on
dollar loans to the Argentinian government has been more than 30 percentage
points recently (see Chart 2.6). Combined with weak deflation, this leads to
very high real interest rates. The country's banks are highly capitalised, but
fear of problems in the banking sector induced customers to withdraw deposits
this summer. At the beginning of November, the Argentinian authorities announced
that they wished to renegotiate parts of the foreign currency debt amounting
to USD 132 billion. The goal is to reduce the budget deficit by reducing the
central government's interest expenses by USD 4 billion.
Chart 2.6
After the Russian government defaulted on its loans in the autumn of 1998,
the risk premium on foreign currency loans was more than 70 percentage points.
Russia has still not renegotiated all of its loans. The agreements that have
been made have substantially reduced debt. Strong economic growth, strengthening
of government finances and lower inflation have renewed confidence in Russia's
debt-servicing capacity. The risk premium is currently lower than for the average
of emerging economies.
The countries in Asia are particularly affected by declining demand for computer
equipment. Although economic developments are very weak, there is no sign of
financial unrest so far.
Indicators of price levels in the stock market
It is normal to assume that the price of a share is equal to the discounted
value of expected future dividends. However, there is uncertainty connected
with the calculation of value. Both the discount factor and the value of future
dividends, which are included in the calculation, are uncertain. The discount
factor is affected by the risk-free interest rate and market participants'
risk preferences. The value of future dividends is influenced by market participants'
expectations. Therefore, at a given point in time, it is difficult to determine
whether the share price is "correct". Certain indicators may, however,
provide useful information about the relationship between share prices and
fundamental factors that affect stock market pricing.
A frequently used indicator is the ratio of market value to companies' total
earnings, ie the Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio. Companies' total earnings
provide the basis for current dividend payments and growth in future dividends.
By studying the P/E ratio, the price level can therefore be seen in relation
to companies' underlying earnings. The interpretation of the P/E ratio depends
on whether historical values or estimates for dividends and earnings are used.
The ratio of total market capitalisation of the stock market in a country
to the country's GDP may also be used as an indicator of the price level in
the stock market. If we interpret GDP as the total return on companies' capital,
the historical trend in this ratio would provide an indication of whether
the price level in the stock market is sustainable.
Comparisons of a company's market capitalisation and the replacement cost
of the company's assets minus debt are often used to assess the price of a
company's shares. This ratio is called Tobin's Q.
If total market capitalisation exceeds the replacement cost, this may indicate
that the market is priced at a high level. This may lead to an increase in
companies' fixed investment so that the price of capital goods goes up. The
difference between the market price and the replacement cost will then fall.
Otherwise, it is assumed that fixed investment is postponed and that the number
of company acquisitions increases. This leads to an increase in the price
of companies so that the difference between replacement cost and market price
is reduced. It can be argued that Tobin's Q should be equal to one in a long-term
equilibrium solution.
Chart 1 shows developments in the three indicators for the US stock market
during the last fifty years. In the third quarter of 1999, all three indicators
showed historical highs. At that time, the P/E ratio of the US stock market
was 36. During the first quarter of 2000, the value of Tobin's Q was 1.8.
Market capitalisation of the stock market for non-financial enterprises was
nearly three times GDP. Since then, all three indicators have fallen somewhat,
but the level is still well above the averages for the last fifty years.
Chart 1
2.2 Securities markets in Norway
The stock market
Since prices peaked on 25 May 2001, the all share index on the Oslo Stock Exchange
has fallen 24% as of 20 November. The Norwegian market fared better than the
markets in Europe and Japan through the summer. After the terrorist attacks
in the US on 11 September, the Norwegian market performed less favourably; the
decline after the attacks was sharper and the subsequent rebound somewhat weaker
than in most other countries (see Chart 2.1). Developments are only partially
explained by the fall in the oil price since the energy index, which includes
Statoil and other oil-related companies, performed better than the all share
index to the middle of November. A sharp drop in prices for Storebrand and DnB
contributed to the marked decline in the financial index in September (see Chart
2.7).
Chart 2.1 Chart
2.7
Turnover in the stock market has gone down so far this year compared with last
year (see Chart 2.8), in part due to a lower price level. Periods of lower share
prices also affect the volume of new share issues. If we disregard the new share
issues in connection with the partial privatisation of Telenor last year and
Statoil this year, the volume of new share issues on the Oslo Stock Exchange
has fallen from a good NOK 25 billion in 2000 to about NOK 10 billion so far
this year. Since this summer, activity in the new issue market has been limited.
Chart 2.8
Listing of Statoil
An important event on the Oslo Stock Exchange this year was the listing of
Statoil in June. When Statoil was partially privatised prior to the introduction
on the stock exchange, 78% of the shares offered were sold to foreign investors.
With a market value of about NOK 128 billion as of 20 November, Statoil is
the largest company on the Oslo Stock Exchange and about 40% larger than the
second largest company, Norsk Hydro. 18.2% of the shares in Statoil may be
traded freely. The rest are government-owned.
We have compared the Oslo Stock Exchange with other stock exchanges during the
periods autumn 1987, summer-autumn 1992, summer-autumn 1998 and September 2001
(see Chart 2.9). The first and last periods may be characterised as periods
of market shock, with a sharp fall in prices over a short period, while the
other two periods were marked by a strong decline in prices over a prolonged
period. Compared with stock markets in other small, open economies, the Oslo
Stock Exchange has recorded the most substantial decline in prices in three
out of four periods. One reason may be that the Oslo Stock Exchange has a large
number of commodities-based companies with volatile earnings, such as the smelting
industry, and relatively few companies with more stable earnings, such as energy
and pharmaceutical companies.
Chart 2.9
Reduced investments in securities funds this year
Due to falling share prices and increased uncertainty, net subscriptions in
securities funds in the first three quarters of 2001 have dropped by 75% compared
with the same period last year (see Chart 2.10). Total net subscriptions in
the period were less than NOK 4.1 billion. There were net redemptions in both
unit trusts and bond funds.
Chart 2.10
Combined total assets in the securities funds have declined by 10% so far this
year, and as of 30 September amounted to NOK 128 billion. As of 30 June 2001,
the household sector's share of total assets was 52%. Institutions' share has
increased in recent years due to an increase in net subscriptions by institutional
investors and to the fact that households have a considerable share in unit
trusts that have declined substantially in value.
Market risk in Norwegian financial institutions
Norwegian banks' shareholdings are very small, while holdings of bonds and
short-term paper are somewhat larger (see Table 2.1). Estimated interest sensitivity
for the bond portfolio indicates that interest-rate risk in banks' trading portfolios
is low. Use of hedging instruments further reduces the risk. Thus, banks' market
risk is relatively small. The market risk may also be measured by using Value
at Risk (VaR) models. VaR models take into account recent price fluctuations
in bond and stock markets and assume that they are representative of market
fluctuations in the immediate future. Based on a simple VaR model, there is
less than 1% probability that the value of the banking sector's securities holdings
will fall more than 2.5% during a two-week period.
Insurance companies have considerable holdings of shares and interest-bearing
securities (see Table 2.1). The equity share in life insurance companies has
declined by 11.2 percentage points since the beginning of the year, while the
bond share has risen by 8.3 percentage points. Total assets amounted to NOK
383 billion at the end of the third quarter. Buffer capital3
fell through the year to 3.8% of total assets at the end of August. Due to the
decline in share prices in September, buffer capital declined further. Extensive
share sales in order to satisfy capital adequacy requirements could have reduced
customers possibilities to achieve satisfactory returns in the long run and
intensified the decline in the Norwegian stock market. To avoid this, the authorities
adjusted the rules at the end of September. At the end of the third quarter,
life insurance companies' buffer capital came to about NOK 10 billion. After
the decline in the securities market, several life insurance companies have
strengthened their capital. The rise in prices in the stock market in October
and so far in November has also contributed to strengthening buffer capital.
Table 2.1
3 Buffer capital consists of
capital in excess of 8%, additional provisions and an adjustment fund.
© 2001 Norges Bank
webmaster@norges-bank.no